Cathedral organist encouraged children to masturbate and watch porn

Rochester Cathedral organist, 48, is jailed for five years after grooming three teenage boys before inviting them into his flat to watch porn and masturbate

  • Scott Farrell, 48, from Wouldham, Kent, befriended boys, aged 13 to 15, at work
  • He took them out for dinner and cinema trips before luring them back to his flat
  • Paedophile performed sex acts on himself and encouraged them to do the same 
  • Police also found images of child showering on his phone after raiding his flat

Scott Farrell (outside Cambridge Crown Court today), 48, of Wouldham, Kent, lured teen boys back to his flat and encouraged them to masturbate with him

A Rochester Cathedral organist has been jailed for five years after luring children back to his flat to show them pornography and encourage them to masturbate.

Scott Farrell, 48, of Wouldham, Kent, used his position to groom three teenage boys and their parents before abusing the youngsters.

He befriended the children, aged between 13 and 15, at work and took them out for burgers and cinema trips to gain their trust.

The paedophile then invited his victims back to his home where he would quiz them about masturbation before putting pornography on his television.

He performed sex acts on himself while the boys watched and encouraged them to do the same.   

Farrell pleaded guilty to three counts of gross indecency with a boy under 16, two counts of voyeurism and one count of taking indecent images of a child.

He appeared at Cambridge Crown Court today where the court heard how one of his victims now needs counselling.

He first held the position of assistant director of music at Ely Cathedral in January 1999 before becoming music director at Rochester Cathedral.

Colleagues described him as having a ‘lively personality’ and said he was a ‘valued and respected’ member of the music department.

But he was exposed in November 2018 when one of his victims had heard about Harvey Weinstein and reported his own abuse to police. Weinstein has been widely accused of sexual abuse although not with anyone underage.

Prosecuting, Charles Falk said Farrell had met the boys through his work and would take the boys out for burgers and took them to the cinemas which as part of a ‘gradual build of trust and friendship.’

Farrell (outside court today) then invited his victims back to his home where he would quiz them about masturbation before putting pornography on his television

The court heard how Farrell would also take the boys on educational music trips and allowed them to turn the pages while the played the organ.

It would start with a conversation about masturbation with Farrell asking his victims: ‘So you guys masturbate right? What’s the best way to do it?’ He would then put DVD’s on and skip to the sex scenes.

Farrell would masturbate while the boys were sat nearby but the court heard how there was never any contact between himself and the victims sexually.

Victims said they felt ‘uncomfortable’ but Farrell reassured him that it was okay and so they believed it was.

Another victim remembered Farrell telling them ‘Come on don’t be shy’ because his trousers weren’t pulled down very far.

When police raided Farrell’s house, they seized his mobile phone which when examined revealed further disturbing offences.

Officers found videos and still images of another boy who was filmed while showering in his own bathroom.

Farrell had befriended the boy’s parents who invited him to stay round their house three or four times after they moved.

He even bought the boy expensive gifts including books that were up to the value of £400.

When police showed the images to his parents, his mother said in a statement that she felt ‘shocked, disgusted and violated.’

It read: ‘I cannot believe that my husband and I continued to believe in Scott and trust him. I cannot begin to discuss how shocked, and disgusted I felt.

Farrell used his position as music director at Rochester Cathedral to groom his victims

‘My husband and I trusted him completely as a family member almost, we allowed him into our home and trusted with completely with our children.’

She also described how she felt like herself and her husband were groomed into allowing him access to their home and their son.

Mr Falk read out part of the victim’s statement: ‘The defendant was an important part of the victim’s life. He struggles to trust people and believes everyone has an ulterior motive.

‘He can’t have a shower without having to check whether there is a camera. He has not slept and once had a dream that the defendant came into his room.. He had a panic attack when he saw that a teacher had the same car as him.

‘He feels angry and worthless. He has had issues with mental health but he has hit rock bottom and says life is pointless.’

Along with the video of the child showering police uncovered two more images of two adult women undressing while they were in his home.

He had built a friendship with both women over the years and secretly recorded them undressing on two separate occasions while they were in his home.

In statements, both girls said this behaviour was ‘out of character’ for Farrell and one did not want him to be punished for his actions.

Defending, Farrell Moham Mau, said he acted out of ‘immaturity’ and said his behaviour though out of line was ‘not predatory.’

He told the court: ‘He would masturbate and others would follow. He crossed the boundaries. 

Farrell (outside court today) pleaded guilty to three counts of gross indecency with a boy under 16, two counts of voyeurism and one count of taking indecent images of a child

‘He saw them as boys together, they would go to the cinema and go back to his flat and watch TV and play video games. It was immaturity.

‘He did seek out permission, but I do not move away from the fact that the boys were in his flat and there was an enormous breach of trust.

‘He is so remorseful and so regretful of the conduct that he now knows should not have taken place.’

The defence lawyer also apologised to the victims on behalf of his client for all the harm caused.

Sentencing Farrell, judge Stuart Bridge, told him: ‘You are a man of good character, I have read documents which indicate the good work done in the community and in your position as assistant director of music.

‘While you were there, you abused that position by inviting young boys aged between 13 and 15 to your flat where abuse took place.

‘It is absolutely clear to me that there must be an immediate sentence of imprisonment.’

Farrell was jailed for five years, was made subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention Order for 15 years and will also be on the Sex Offenders register for life.

A restraining order was also put in place in relation to one of the victims.

Source: Read Full Article