WASHINGTON \u2014 Donald Trump clung to his core election falsehoods in his first post-presidential speech, wrongly blamed wind power for the catastrophic power failures in Texas and revived a variety of the baseless claims that saturated his time in office, on immigration, the economy and more.<\/p>\n
A look at Trump\u2019s remarks Sunday at the Conservative Political Action Conference:<\/p>\n
TRUMP<\/strong>, assailing Democrats on energy policy: \u201cThe windmill calamity that we\u2019re witnessing in Texas \u2026 it\u2019s so sad when you look at it. That will just be the start.\u201d<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong>, on President Joe Biden: \u201cHe wants windmills. \u2026 The windmills that don\u2019t work when you need them.\u201d<\/p>\n THE FACTS<\/strong>: \u201cWindmill calamity\u201d is a false characterization. The power outages during the severe February storm in Texas were primarily due to failures in natural gas, coal and nuclear energy systems, not wind and solar.<\/p>\n Those traditional sources were responsible for nearly twice as many outages as frozen wind turbines and solar panels, according to the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, which operates the state\u2019s power grid.<\/p>\n ERCOT reported that of the 45,000 total megawatts of power that were offline statewide during the winter storm, about 30,000 consisted of thermal sources \u2014 gas, coal and nuclear plants \u2014 and 16,000 came from renewable sources. Wind only supplies about a quarter of the electricity in Texas.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s not like we were relying on it to ride us through this event,\u201d Joshua Rhodes, a research associate at the Webber Energy Group at the University of Texas at Austin, said of wind power. \u201cNor would it have been able to save us even if it were operating at 100% capacity right now. We just don\u2019t have enough of it.\u201d<\/p>\n Wind power comes from turbines, not windmills. Windmills grind grain. Trump always gets that wrong.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong>: \u201cHad we had a fair election, the results would\u2019ve been much different.\u201d<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong>: \u201cYou cannot have a situation where ballots are indiscriminately pouring in from all over the country \u2026 where illegal aliens and dead people are voting.\u201d<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong>: \u201cThis election was rigged and the Supreme Court and other courts didn\u2019t want to do anything about it.\u201d<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong> on Democrats: \u201cThey just lost the White House. \u2026 I may even decide to beat them for a third time.\u201d<\/p>\n THE FACTS<\/strong>: All of this is flatly wrong, except it is true that the high court did not intervene, because the justices \u2014 Trump nominees among them \u2014 saw no reason to.<\/p>\n Biden won the election. It was run and counted fairly. His victory was affirmed in Congress, with Trump\u2019s vice president presiding over the process in the Senate, in the hours after the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol insurrection by a mob stoked by Trump.<\/p>\n Trump\u2019s allegations of massive voting fraud were either refuted or brushed off as groundless by a variety of judges, state election officials, an arm of his own administration\u2019s Homeland Security Department, and his own attorney general. His campaign\u2019s lawsuits across the country were thrown out of court or otherwise came to nothing.<\/p>\n No case established irregularities of a scale that would change the outcome \u2014 no flood of dead people voting or ballots \u201cindiscriminately pouring in from all over the country.\u201d<\/p>\n Biden earned 306 electoral votes to Trump\u2019s 232, the same margin that Trump had when he beat Hillary Clinton in 2016, which he repeatedly described as a \u201clandslide.\u201d (Trump ended up with 304 electoral votes because two electors defected.)<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong>, on foreign countries that are the source of migrants to the U.S.: \u201cThey\u2019re not giving us their best and their finest.\u201d<\/p>\n THE FACTS<\/strong>: This falsehood goes way back in the Trump administration. Foreign countries do not select people to send to the U.S. That is not at all how immigration works.<\/p>\n He is referring to the diversity visa lottery program, although he did not identify it as such in these remarks. As president, Trump routinely assailed the program, mischaracterizing it as one in which other countries pick out undesirable citizens to send to the U.S.<\/p>\n The U.S. government runs the visa program and foreigners who want to come to the U.S. apply for it. The program requires applicants to have completed a high school education or have at least two years of experience in the last five years in a selection of fields identified by the Labor Department.<\/p>\n Out of that pool of people from certain countries who meet those conditions, the State Department randomly selects a much smaller pool of winners. Not all winners will have visas ultimately approved. It\u2019s not a pipeline for countries to send their troublemakers to the U.S.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong>: \u201cWe took in hundreds of billions of dollars from China during my administration. They never gave us 10 cents.\u201d<\/p>\n THE FACTS<\/strong>: False and false, and very familiar.<\/p>\n It\u2019s false to say the U.S. never collected a dime in tariffs on Chinese goods before he took action. They are simply higher in some cases than they were before.<\/p>\n It\u2019s also wrong to say the tariffs are being paid by China. Tariff money coming into the treasury is mainly from U.S. businesses and consumers, not from China. Tariffs are primarily if not entirely a tax paid domestically.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\n TRUMP<\/strong>: \u201cWe built the strongest economy in the history of the world.\u201d<\/p>\n THE FACTS<\/strong>: No, the numbers show it wasn\u2019t the greatest in U.S. history, much less in the history of the world. He was actually the first president since Herbert Hoover in the Depression to leave office with fewer jobs than when he started.<\/p>\n The U.S. did have the most jobs on record before the pandemic, but population growth explains part of that. The 3.5% unemployment rate before the pandemic-induced recession was at a half-century low, but the percentage of people working or searching for jobs was still below a 2000 peak.<\/p>\n Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Romer looked at Trump\u2019s economic growth record. Growth under Trump averaged 2.48% annually before the pandemic, only slightly better than the 2.41% gains achieved during Barack Obama\u2019s second term. By contrast, the economic expansion that began in 1982 during Ronald Reagan\u2019s presidency averaged 4.2% a year.<\/p>\n ___<\/p>\nELECTION<\/h2>\n
IMMIGRATION<\/h2>\n
CHINA<\/h2>\n
ECONOMY<\/h2>\n