Mined digital currency should not be taxed by the IRS because it is the creation of property, according to representations made before a federal court.<\/p>\n
The court heard arguments from a Tennessee couple who were charged tax on the creation of 8,876 units of a digital currency called Tezos.<\/p>\n
The transaction was reported to the IRS as \u201cother income,\u201d resulting in a tax charge of $9,407. However, the couple subsequently filed for a refund, suggesting that the creation of digital currency does not constitute taxable income, but instead a creative activity\u2014similar to a baker baking a cake.<\/p>\n
In their complaint, the Jarretts said the IRS was attempting an unprecedented action in demanding tax on the creation of assets, rather than income.<\/p>\n
“The United States here seeks to use the federal income tax law to do something unprecedented, which is tax creative activity rather than income. Taxing newly created cakes, books or tokens as income would have far-reaching and detrimental effects on taxpayers and the U.S. economy, and is without support in the Internal Revenue Code, regulations, case law or the Constitution.”<\/p>\n
In their argument, the couple cited Eisner v. Macomber from the Supreme Court in 1920, which said income has to involve a \u201ccoming in,\u201d rather than a creation.<\/p>\n
Similarly, they argued the precedent set by the Supreme Court in 1955 in Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass which described income as “instances of undeniable accessions to wealth, clearly realized, and over which the taxpayers have complete dominion.” However, in their case, there had yet to be any \u2018realization\u2019 which could be categorized as taxable.<\/p>\n
The Jarretts are asking the court to order a refund of $3293 in taxes paid, as well as an increase in tax credits of $500, to which the IRS has yet to respond.<\/p>\n
See also: CoinGeek Live panel on Regulation of Digital Assets & Digital Asset Businesses<\/p>\n