Regulatory walls have been closing on Binance, the beleaguered cryptocurrency exchange that\u2019s been operating in total ignorance of financial regulations across the world. Now caught in a chokehold by regulators from Malaysia to the U.K. and even the Cayman Islands, the exchange is attempting to play catch up. It has now tightened its customer identification programs, but this came a little too late as some major investors had already pulled out of a $100 million funding round for its U.S. subsidiary.<\/p>\n
Binance was founded in July 2017, years after the likes of Coinbase, Huobi, OKEx, Bitstamp and Bithumb had launched. However, CEO and founder Changpeng Zhao, was aggressive and listed every other token, propelling the exchange to the top. However, it turned out he was doing more than just being aggressive\u2014he was more often than not operating outside the scope of financial regulations.<\/p>\n
Way before global regulators had started becoming suspicious of Binance\u2019s activities, CoinGeek\u2019s Crypto Crime Cartel series had called out the exchange for its lack of anti-money laundering checks which allowed criminals to launder their money. Forbes would later obtain documents that showed that breaking financial laws was central to Binance\u2019s actual business strategy, for which it got sued but the lawsuit was later dropped.<\/p>\n
And now, Binance is scrambling to catch up with regulations it has ignored for four years in compliance efforts theatrics.<\/p>\n
Tightening of AML checks (after ignoring them for 4 years)<\/strong><\/p>\n The latest from Binance is that it\u2019s now tightening its anti-money laundering checks. In a recent announcement, the exchange revealed that it would require all its users to complete Intermediate Verification. The exchange claimed that the move is part of an ever-ongoing review of its products and services to \u201cdetermine changes and improvements in light of evolving global compliance standards.\u201d<\/p>\n Intermediate Verification includes users having to submit government-issued ID and undergoing facial verification. Many exchanges, especially the bigger ones serving users globally, already have this KYC requirements, with Coinbase and Gemini among the prime examples. Although there are those that are still flouting these laws like Kraken, whose CEO has no problem admitting to bank fraud on social media.<\/p>\n \u201cActions speak louder than words,\u201d Changpeng Zhao stated on Twitter while announcing the new requirements.<\/p>\n In a separate statement, the Binance CEO added, \u201cWe aim to work more collaboratively with policy-makers to improve global standards and discourage bad actors.\u201d<\/p>\n This move is nowhere near enough to appease regulators, legal experts believe. Alireza Siadat, a partner at Annerton LLP in Frankfurt is one of those casting doubt on whether this in itself is near enough to push regulatory crackdown back.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is a nice marketing statement, but from the regulators’ perspective, this is not enough,\u201d he told Reuters.<\/p>\n He added, \u201cSince they are doing it on a voluntarily basis, regulators do not know whether they have the authority to supervise the identity check, and no one can look whether they are doing it properly.\u201d<\/p>\n Investors pull out of $100M funding round for Binance US<\/strong><\/p>\n All the mayhem around the world\u2019s largest exchange has seen it lose customers, halt products such as derivatives in Hong Kong and lose some of its top leaders. Now, the mayhem has seen it lose out on funding to the tune of over $100 million for its U.S. subsidiary.<\/p>\n The cracks first showed on August 6 when Brian Brooks resigned as the Binance.US CEO. Brooks had joined the exchange three months prior. He had joined following a brief stint as the Acting Comptroller of the Currency, a post in which he endeared himself to the digital currency community through a series of actions that gave financial institutions clarity on how to handle digital currencies.<\/p>\n In an accompanying statement, Brooks, who has also had a stint as the head of compliance at Coinbase, revealed that he had departed due to strategic differences with the Binance U.S leadership. CZ, in his usual style, assured users that the \u201ctransition will not impact Binance.US customers in any way.\u201d<\/p>\n Now, more details have emerged over Brooks\u2019 departure, and they are tied to regulatory pressure and a botched attempt to raise $100 million.<\/p>\n According to the New York Times, Brooks was leading a fundraising process that sought to bring in $100 million. He was in talks with GreatPoint Ventures, a VC firm led by Ray Lane. Speaking to NYT, Lane revealed that though his firm had never made a digital currency investment, he had a lot of faith in Brooks and was ready to participate in the funding round.<\/p>\n Brooks had assured them that the U.S. subsidiary would be fully independent from the global exchange. However, this was more of an \u2018on-paper-promise,\u2019 especially given that CZ reportedly owns 90% of Binance.US. Moreover, the exchange\u2019s board of directors consists of CZ, the acting CEO and Gin Chao, the Binance global chief strategy officer. What tipped over the scales against the investment for GreatPoint, however, was U.S. regulators going after the exchange.<\/p>\n Binance went to great lengths to convince GreatPoint, and other investors like SoftBank, that it was getting on regulators\u2019 good books. It even hired Manuel Alvarez, the former top banking regulator for California as its chief administrative officer. But it was too little too late. The investors had already been spooked.<\/p>\n Immediately the investors pulled out, Alvarez and Brooks resigned.<\/p>\n Binance.US is still adamant that it will go on with its fundraising as planned and even follow Coinbase down the IPO route.<\/p>\n \u201cFund-raising and engaging potential investors is an essential part of Binance.US\u2019s long-term strategy. It\u2019s just a matter of time,\u201d Hazel Watts, a spokesperson for Binance stated.<\/p>\n