![](\"https:\/\/i.dailymail.co.uk\/1s\/2021\/09\/10\/23\/47769389-9978965-image-a-10_1631312383840.jpg\")
<\/p>\nMonstrous is one of the politer ways it has been described. Some have compared it to a civic centre, a Bond villain\u2019s lair or a Holiday Inn.<\/p>\n
But everyone agrees that Grand Designs\u2019 latest talking-point has got people talking.<\/p>\n
Made from 34 zinc-clad shards jutting over seven metres high into the Devon sky, the structure in last week\u2019s opening episode of the latest series is 70 metres long and consists of 300 timber beams and triple-glazed glass units, each weighing up to a ton.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
What is arguably Grand Designs\u2019 most audacious project to date has divided opinion. While some have praised it, others are scornful about a building that ended up costing its wealthy owners \u00a32.5 million and from the outside resembles, in Kevin McCloud\u2019s words, \u2018a giant zinc monster\u2019<\/p>\n
What\u2019s more, it went almost \u00a32 million over budget and took more than three years longer than expected to complete.<\/p>\n
By halfway through the episode, viewers were fully expecting the building in question \u2014 Hux Shard \u2014 to be another of the Channel 4 programme\u2019s overly ambitious projects, destined to fail and in the process break up the stressed couple whose hare-brained idea it had been.<\/p>\n
Come the final advert break, they could be forgiven for expecting presenter Kevin McCloud to return for his last visit to an abandoned heap of rubble on site.<\/p>\n
But Hux Shard hasn\u2019t played out to the predicted narrative. The 6,000 sq ft sculptural home, said to have been created to mimic the Dartmoor tors, has been completed.<\/p>\n
Its owners, 37-year-old tax consultant Joe Priday and his wife Claire, 42, a marketing executive, have just moved in \u2014 their children Jasmine, ten; Evan, five; and three-year-old Rory delighting in the \u2018racetrack\u2019 229ft-long corridor that runs through the house.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i.dailymail.co.uk\/1s\/2021\/09\/10\/23\/47769387-9978965-image-a-11_1631312390278.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
The unusual home, which Kevin McCloud likened to a ‘spaceship’ featured an open plan living area as well as a huge gym and games room\u00a0<\/p>\n
With a \u00a3125,000 kitchen, a 6ft-wide front door that opens with facial recognition, LED lights embedded in the walls and a floor suspended off the ground, the four-bedroom home is as high-tech inside as it is mindboggling outside.<\/p>\n
And Joe, who had aspired to create \u2018one of the best homes on the planet\u2019, is delighted.<\/p>\n
\u2018I am completely and utterly satisfied \u2014 and that\u2019s quite rare for me,\u2019 he said.<\/p>\n
But what is arguably Grand Designs\u2019 most audacious project to date has divided opinion. While some have praised it, others are scornful about a building that ended up costing its wealthy owners \u00a32.5 million and from the outside resembles, in Kevin McCloud\u2019s words, \u2018a giant zinc monster\u2019.<\/p>\n
Among the verdicts on social media were \u2018staggering vanity project\u2019 and \u2018sickening\u2019, while Joe, whose six expensive cars in the garage provided insurance lest he run out of money (he didn\u2019t), was described as \u2018smug and unlikeable\u2019, content to \u2018throw\u2019 cash at an ostentatious house with scant regard for those who can\u2019t afford to get on the property ladder at all.<\/p>\n
As one viewer put it: \u2018At least four or five families could have built more-than-adequate, sustainable houses on that plot and all got to enjoy the views.\u2019<\/p>\n
So how was Hux Shard \u2014 atop a hill, overlooking rolling countryside near the village of Pinhoe on the outskirts of Exeter, within metres of other ordinary homes \u2014 granted planning permission, when getting the go-ahead to build rural homes is usually as hard as Dartmoor granite?<\/p>\n
And what on earth do the neighbours think?<\/p>\n
Hux Shard sits behind a tall fence with a newly planted beech hedge on a narrow lane. Only the points of the roof can be seen from the road, but neighbours on the same side of the road can see the whole of it from their gardens.<\/p>\n
Opinion is mixed in this genteel community of several homes within a stone\u2019s throw of the property \u2014 and some people spoke to the Mail on condition of anonymity, so as not to fall out with the new residents.<\/p>\n
One described it as \u2018a bit of an eyesore\u2019, while a second, whose view of the countryside has been blocked by the shards, was admirably philosophical: \u2018I don\u2019t want to sound like Prince Charles, not liking modern buildings.<\/p>\n
\u2018Maybe in 50 years\u2019 time people will drive past and say \u201cOh, what a wonderful building\u201d. I\u2019m trying to be kind but our view was more attractive before that structure went up. I would prefer it wasn\u2019t there.<\/p>\n
\u2018Art is a matter of taste and I\u2019m not sure it\u2019s to my taste.\u2019<\/p>\n
Then again, Joe, a former director of a wealth management company who wanted the house to have the wow factor of a collectable Ferrari, is nobody\u2019s idea of an average homeowner.<\/p>\n
He has made money from advising people how to invest, spotting opportunities in unlikely places.<\/p>\n
Quiet-spoken Claire, who admits she is \u2018not as ambitious\u2019 as her husband, says her main ambition is \u2018to keep the family unit happy and alive, really, most days\u2019.<\/p>\n
The couple bought a bungalow next door to their current house in 2013 and paid \u00a365,000 for the adjoining paddock. Shortly afterwards they applied for planning permission to build there, not thinking for a second it would be granted. It is notoriously difficult to obtain permission to build new rural homes \u2014 and at the time their local authority, East Devon District Council, was being criticised for allowing developers to build new housing estates in countryside locations.<\/p>\n
But a loophole in the National Planning Policy Framework, then known as Paragraph 55 and now as Paragraph 80, offers an exemption from all planning permission constraints for houses considered architecturally outstanding.<\/p>\n
You may be more likely to get away with a sci-fi creation than with a run-of-the-mill semi \u2014 so Joe enlisted the services of architect Mick O\u2019Connor. \u2018We said we\u2019ve got to come up with something that\u2019s unusual. And we did,\u2019 says Mick, 71, from nearby Chagford and the founder of architecture company Squirrel Design.<\/p>\n
Deciding that going \u2018up in height\u2019 would \u2018create hassle\u2019 with planners, Mick came up with the linear shape of the house and the concept of using glass to make the most of the stunning views, combined with angled walls to look like shards.<\/p>\n
What he didn\u2019t do, however, was base the design on the Dartmoor tors \u2014 rock formations some 20 miles away. \u2018To be frank, Grand Designs made that up,\u2019 Mick says.<\/p>\n
\u2018We came to the conclusion that this building is on a hillside. It\u2019s going to be seen. We wanted it to look like a work of art, a sculpture.\u2019<\/p>\n
Perhaps surprisingly, there was only one objection to the plans, submitted in 2017.<\/p>\n
\u2018We said it would affect the views. We\u2019ve been here for 21 years,\u2019 the objector told the Mail. \u2018There was a lovely green field there.\u2019<\/p>\n
Yet farmer Mike Wills, 65, who rents the land behind Hux Shard, feels differently: \u2018There are hundreds of houses going in at the bottom of the village and I\u2019m not sure how good that is for the community and the environment.<\/p>\n
\u2018Something like this is great for Exeter and Devon. It\u2019s a high-value house and shows what can be done with a bit of effort and thought.\u2019<\/p>\n
Joe, Mick says, was instantly sold on his idea, if shocked: \u2018There were probably a few complimentary expletives but he has imagination.\u2019<\/p>\n
And cash, of course \u2014 which helped when it became clear that the ambitious structure would cost a lot more than the original \u00a3825,000 estimate.<\/p>\n
Building finally started in 2018.<\/p>\n
![](\"https:\/\/i.dailymail.co.uk\/1s\/2021\/09\/10\/23\/47769385-9978965-image-a-12_1631312396266.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
Both Claire and Joe admitted the project was becoming ‘a bit excessive’, with the kitchen costing over \u00a3125,000. Pictured, the living room<\/p>\n
The project\u2019s structural engineer, Phil Thorpe of TWP Ltd, explains that although the shards look as if they are coming straight out of the ground, they are actually attached to timber frames which sit on top of steel columns sticking up from the foundation.<\/p>\n
Phil was concerned about the impact of the weather. \u2018You don\u2019t see many sailing boats on the water in a 20-30mph wind, yet we have to design one of those shards to resist 90mph wind and not move,\u2019 he said, adding that another challenge was \u2018trying to make a frame so rigid it doesn\u2019t defect so much that it cracks those very expensive pieces of glass\u2019.<\/p>\n
Thirty-six glazed units costing \u00a3200,000 including installation were fitted to the frames with brackets \u2018so the bottom bracket holds the pane in place. The clamp at the top stops it blowing out in high wind,\u2019 says Phil. \u2018It looks like this glass is frameless because it\u2019s all hidden.\u2019 Fitting the glass proved so complex, with some windows being six metres high, that the original glaziers were ditched.<\/p>\n
Phil Catterall, whose glass manufacturing firm System 3 Ltd took over, admits \u2018the guys in the factory were swearing at me for taking the order on\u2019 as the project \u2018pushed the boundaries of what is possible in terms of glass processing\u2019. He adds: \u2018As a business, we are very proud of what we have achieved. It was one of the craziest and most difficult jobs they have ever had on Grand Designs.\u2019<\/p>\n
Then on top of the structural problems, there were complications and cost increases caused by Brexit and then Covid.<\/p>\n
David Thomas, 73, who lives a few doors away, says: \u2018The actual building doesn\u2019t affect us but it went on for so long.\u2019<\/p>\n
A retired air traffic controller who lives in a cottage that he and his wife built 30 years ago, he adds: \u2018We can\u2019t knock them for building, as we built our own home here. But [Hux Shard] isn\u2019t really fitting in the surroundings.\u2019<\/p>\n
While neighbours\u2019 patience may have started to wear thin, though, Joe \u2014 who at one stage was spending \u00a320,000 a week on labour alone \u2014 remained remarkably sanguine about the eye-watering costs. \u2018The thing is, it was well within the client\u2019s affordability,\u2019 says Mick.<\/p>\n
By the time 30km of cable had been laid, Claire who had become \u2018more emotionally involved\u2019 by choosing interiors, including that kitchen. With four ovens, worktops made of Dekton \u2014 more expensive than granite \u2014 and an extractor fan that rises from the worktop , it is, Kevin McCloud said, \u2018like being in an alien world\u2019.<\/p>\n
Equally other-worldly are the angular windows, LED lighting in the walls and floor, and the glass roof \u2014 with sloping slides joined by a short vertical wall \u2014 that allows in the morning and evening sun.<\/p>\n
The energy-efficient house runs on solar panels and an air source heat pump, while a half-metre gap between the ground and the frame \u2018regulates temperature and moisture\u2019, says Phil Thorpe.<\/p>\n
The engineer admits he is still terrified by the thought of shattered glass, though. \u2018The next gale-force wind we have, I\u2019ll think, hmm, is it all right?\u2019 he says, adding hurriedly: \u2018It\u2019s always all right.\u2019<\/p>\n
Neighbour Mike Wills is a fan: \u2018The finished thing is great,\u2019 he says. And Claire also sounds happy, if a bit shell-shocked: \u2018I could never in my wildest dreams have thought I\u2019d live in such an amazing house.\u2019<\/p>\n
Mick says the Hux Shard has \u2018got people thinking that houses don\u2019t have to be the sort you see drawn at infant school, where they have a door in the middle and a window each side. It doesn\u2019t have to follow the prevailing orthodoxies.\u2019<\/p>\n
Certainly, this one doesn\u2019t.<\/p>\n
Yet as one neighbour remarked: \u2018I prefer thatched farm homes. But each to their own.\u2019<\/p>\n
Additional reporting: Stephanie Condron<\/p>\n