WASHINGTON \u2014 The president of the United States spent four minutes on Tuesday talking to the American public about the possibilities and dangers of artificial intelligence. No, not that president. The one who actually occupies the Oval Office. <\/p>\n
Americans could be forgiven if they momentarily forgot the most powerful person in the country. As helicopters and cameras followed every step of the Donald J. Trump legal drama in New York more than 200 miles to the north with white Ford Bronco-level intensity, President Biden faded into the background, ceding the stage to his defendant-predecessor.<\/p>\n
He seemed content to do so, at least for now. The White House made no effort to compete for attention with the arrest of a former president. Mr. Biden\u2019s only appearance came during a meeting with his science advisers. Reporters were escorted in at 2:59 p.m., a hoarse Mr. Biden, fighting a cold, said a few words and the reporters were ushered out again at 3:03 p.m. Ten minutes later, the White House announced Mr. Biden was finished with public events for the day.<\/p>\n
The tale of two presidents on this spring afternoon, one quietly focused on technology policy, the other having his fingerprints taken, underscored the unique challenge that has confronted Mr. Biden since taking office more than two years ago. No commander in chief in more than a century has been eclipsed in the public eye by the leader he succeeded the way Mr. Biden has at times. Now with the first criminal prosecution of a former president in American history, it will be that much harder to command the national conversation.<\/p>\n
Yet it is a contrast that Mr. Biden\u2019s team hopes will eventually benefit him. To the extent that the remainder of Mr. Biden\u2019s term is a split screen between the 45th and 46th presidents, White House officials are willing to live with less airtime if it means their president is seen focusing on manufacturing, health care and climate change while the other one is seen focusing on pretrial motions, hostile witnesses and records of hush money paid to a porn star.<\/p>\n
\u201cTwenty twenty-three is going to be about Trump \u2014 his legal troubles are going to be a defining story,\u201d said Jennifer Palmieri, who was White House communications director for President Barack Obama and a senior campaign adviser to Hillary Clinton. \u201cWhat does the White House do about that? On some level, that\u2019s fine. These stories will peak, and then they\u2019ll go away. What Biden has to be is the anti-chaos president.\u201d<\/p>\n
The wild gyrations of the Trump show, in this view, only reinforce the reasons voters turned to Mr. Biden in the first place \u2014 the appeal of a steady hand against the storm.<\/p>\n
\u201cAll of this could contribute to lack of faith in institutions, a sense of chaos, disorder, and so the Biden team has to work extra hard at showing that government can work,\u201d Ms. Palmieri said.<\/p>\n
Still, anti-chaos may be appealing to voters exhausted by Trumpian turmoil, but it has not historically been a big ratings draw. \u201cI assume Biden\u2019s team will say the split-screen contrast works in their favor,\u201d said Kevin Madden, a longtime Republican strategist. \u201cThe problem, though, is with Trump there could be days or weeks like this one where they never get their half of the screen.\u201d<\/p>\n
No other president would want the kind of publicity that Mr. Trump is getting now, of course, but the fixation on the former president will extend beyond even this historic prosecution. Fani T. Willis, the Fulton County district attorney in Georgia, may decide soon whether to charge Mr. Trump in trying to interfere in the 2020 election, while Jack Smith, a federal special counsel, could seek indictments tied to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and the former president\u2019s refusal to turn over classified documents.<\/p>\n
How Times reporters cover politics.<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0We rely on our journalists to be independent observers. So while Times staff members may vote, they are not allowed to endorse or campaign for candidates or political causes. This includes participating in marches or rallies in support of a movement or giving money to, or raising money for, any political candidate or election cause.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n As if those were not enough to keep the spotlight focused squarely on Mar-a-Lago rather than the White House, Mr. Trump is already scheduled to go on trial on April 25 in a civil lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll, a writer who has accused him of raping her. And a civil trial on allegations of financial fraud brought by Letitia James, the New York attorney general, is scheduled to follow on Oct. 2.<\/p>\n Against all that, a meeting of the President\u2019s Council of Advisers on Science and Technology may not seem as compelling to cable television producers or for that matter their audiences. When Mr. Biden flew to Minnesota on Monday to promote a factory making hydrogen electrolyzers, the news channels showed Mr. Trump\u2019s private plane, the so-called \u201cTrump Force One,\u201d taking off for New York.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m flipping stations and shaking my head,\u201d Michael Steele, a former Republican National Committee chairman who broke with Trump, wrote on Twitter. \u201cIt\u2019s no wonder we can\u2019t recover from this Trump infection because the media continues to feed Trump\u2019s thirst to be everything everywhere all at once! On the plane, off the plane, in the car. Y\u2019all know the actual @POTUS travelled today?\u201d<\/p>\n The White House was left to make the best of the situation. Jeffrey D. Zients, the new chief of staff, posted an image of the front page of The Star Tribune of Minneapolis featuring the headline \u201cBiden touts investment in Minn.\u201d<\/p>\n The nonstop motorcade-to-courthouse-to-plane-to-Florida-to-estate coverage of Mr. Trump\u2019s arraignment and travels on Tuesday brought to mind the O.J. Simpson case for many old enough to remember the obsessive interest in the celebrity murder case. There came a moment during that saga when even President Bill Clinton was forced to share a television screen on one of his biggest nights, as he delivered his State of the Union address in 1997 at the same time a jury was handing down its verdict in the civil trial.<\/p>\n But that was a one-off situation. With rare exceptions, Mr. Clinton and other presidents in the modern age have enjoyed unrivaled control of the bully pulpit. For the most part, their predecessors made a point of staying out of sight. Even former presidents who outspokenly criticized their successors, like Herbert Hoover and Jimmy Carter, hardly came close to dominating the news the way Mr. Trump does.<\/p>\n The closest parallel to Mr. Biden\u2019s situation may be that of William Howard Taft, who could hardly compete for attention with his larger-than-life predecessor, Theodore Roosevelt, who ultimately mounted an unsuccessful comeback campaign against his onetime ally in 1912. That, of course, was long before the era of social media and cable television.<\/p>\n \u201cIt is a challenge for governing,\u201d said Julian E. Zelizer, a presidential historian at Princeton. \u201cPart of what presidents do is shift the agenda to issues they want Congress and the public to focus on. That\u2019s hard with Trump in the picture. The advantage is it creates space for low-level policymaking outside the radar on issues that might otherwise create public controversy.\u201d<\/p>\n Indeed, Mr. Biden\u2019s brief public appearance on Tuesday did not mean he was not working behind the scenes. He placed calls to President Emmanuel Macron of France and King Charles III of Britain. On his Twitter feed, he (or his tweet writers) maintained a steady patter of earnest posts, promoting his budget, congratulating college basketball tournament winners and wishing those who celebrate a happy Mahavir Jayanti marking the birth of Lord Mahavira, who created the defining rules of Jainism, an Indian religion.<\/p>\n Mr. Biden left it to his press secretary, Karine Jean-Pierre, to deflect the obvious questions about Mr. Trump. During her daily briefing, she talked about Finland\u2019s ascension into NATO, Russia\u2019s arrest of an American journalist and the president\u2019s meeting with tech advisers. But the first arrest of a former president and \u201canything that is touching or relating to the case,\u201d she declared, was off limits.<\/p>\n Not that reporters in the White House briefing room neglected to press her. They asked about security concerns in New York and the rule of law. They inquired whether the president watched the televised proceedings and if he would consider pardoning Mr. Trump, even though a president\u2019s pardon power does not extend to state cases like the one in New York.<\/p>\n When one reporter noted that there is \u201cgreat shock in Japan about the arrest of the opposition candidate,\u201d Ms. Jean-Pierre appeared confused for a moment, until she realized that it was just one more effort to get her to discuss Mr. Trump.<\/p>\n \u201cI love how you guys are asking me this in different ways,\u201d she said. She then repeated what she had said again and again: \u201cI\u2019m just not going to comment from here\u201d before calling an end to the day\u2019s briefing.<\/p>\n By the evening, her briefing got 10,000 views on the White House website and the president\u2019s brief science remarks 1,600. Within hours, Mr. Trump was scheduled to make a prime-time statement on his arrest with millions expected to tune in.<\/p>\n