UPDATE, Wednesday: A bill to protect same-sex marriage rights at the federal level advanced in a 62-37 vote on Wednesday, as twelve Republicans joined all Democrats to bring the legislation to the floor.
A final vote is expected this week.
In the chamber, one of the bill’s key sponsors, Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), the first openly LGBT member of the Senate, huddled with other supporters during the roll call, keeping tabs on the vote on a memo pad.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said before the vote that passing the legislation was “as personal as it gets for so many of us in this chamber, myself included.”
Related Story
Catherine Cortez Masto Projected To Win Nevada Senate Seat; Democrats Retain Control Of Upper Chamber
“My daughter and her wife—my daughter in law—are expecting a baby next spring, and I want to do everything possible to make sure their rights are protected under federal law,” Schumer said. “I want them, and everyone in a loving relationship, to live without the fear that their rights could one day be stripped way. So there are many of us who are deeply invested in seeing this bill succeed.”
Republicans who voted for the legislation included Richard Burr and Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Rob Portman of Ohio, Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Susan Collins of Maine, Shelley Capito of West Virginia, Dan Sullivan and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Mitt Romney of Utah, Roy Blunt of Missouri, Joni Ernst of Iowa and Todd Young of Indiana. The bill needed 60 votes to advance.
The legislation, the Respect for Marriage Act, would require that the federal government recognize a marriage if it is valid in the state in which it was performed. The couples would be entitled to “full faith and credit” of the federal government, but it would not require that a state issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple.
The legislation also includes provisions that religious organizations and non-profits would not be required to provide services or goods for marriage ceremonies. Another provision protects religious liberty and conscience protections available under the Constitution or federal law. The bill also includes a clause that the federal government would not be required or authorized to recognize polygamous marriages.
Chief Senate backers of the bill, including Baldwin and Portman, said earlier this week that they were confident they had the votes to get the legislation to the floor. But it was unclear which Republicans would vote in favor. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell declined to tell reporters on Tuesday which way he would vote, and he ultimately was one of the last lawmakers to come to the floor for the roll call. He voted no.
In a statement, Lummis said that “as a Christian and a conservative, ensuring that the religious liberties of people in Wyoming are protected and that no institution would be forced to perform a ceremony that is not in line with their values is absolutely essential.” She said that the legislation reflected a balance of religious beliefs and individual liberties.
PREVIOUSLY, Monday, 1:46 PM PT: A bipartisan group of senators expressed confidence that they have the votes to pass legislation to protect same-sex marriage amid concerns that some future Supreme Court decision would roll back nationwide rights.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer had put off a vote on the legislation until after the midterms and into the lame-duck session. With reports that the legislation may come to the Senate floor as soon as this week, the lawmakers released a statement on Monday saying, “We look forward to this legislation coming to the floor and are confident that this amendment has helped earn the broad, bipartisan support needed to pass our commonsense legislation into law.”
The senators spearheading the legislation include Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC).
Sixty votes would be needed to overcome the threat of a filibuster.
The legislation, the Respect for Marriage Act, would require that the federal government recognize a marriage if it is valid in the state in which it was performed. The couples would be entitled to “full faith and credit” of the federal government, but it would not require that a state issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple.
The legislation also includes provisions that religious organizations and non-profits would not be required to provide services or goods for marriage ceremonies. Another provision protects religious liberty and conscience protections available under the Constitution or federal law. The bill also includes a clause that the federal government would not be required or authorized to recognize polygamous marriages.
The House overwhelmingly passed same-sex marriage protections in July. If the bill passes the Senate, it still would have to go back to the House because of the amendment added in the upper chamber.
The impetus for the legislation was Justice Clarence Thomas’ concurring opinion in the Dobbs decision that reversed Roe v. Wade. Thomas suggested that the high court should review other past precedent, including the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Obergefell vs. Hodges that struck down bans on same-sex marriage.
Must Read Stories
Amy Reisenbach Upped To Entertainment President; Kelly Kahl Exits & Thom Sherman Steps Down
‘Wakanda Forever’ Clears $204M+ & Eyes $70M+ Second Frame: Weekend Preview
Jonah Hill Set To Direct Secret Project ‘Outcome’ With Keanu Reeves Starring
Mel Gibson Won’t Be Testifying In Harvey Weinstein’s L.A. Rape Trial After All
Read More About:
Source: Read Full Article