Calls for SNL to APOLOGIZE for 'unfunny' anti-Semitism hearing sketch

Calls grow for SNL to APOLOGIZE for its ‘unfunny’ anti-Semitism hearing sketch that mocked GOP Rep. Stefanik for calling out elite colleges INSTEAD of their president’s shameful testimony

  • Saturday Night Live continues to feel the backlash for its opening sketch
  • The show mocked GOP Congresswoman Elise Stefanik for her callout of elite college presidents over antisemitism 
  • Several conservative commentators voiced their outrage while others posted to X calling for the show to apologize 

Saturday Night Live continues to feel the backlash for its cold open sketch last night where the show mocked GOP Congresswoman Elise Stefanik for her callout of elite college presidents over antisemitism. 

The opening sketch attempted to make light of the college presidents’ lacking testimony, but their efforts evoked few laughs.

The sketch continued to draw the ire across the political spectrum, with many calling for the show to apologize after missing the mark and backing ‘woke’ instead of calling out the leaders for their inability to denounce harassment. 

Conservative media personality Meghan McCain wrote: ‘There is a 400% increase in antisemitic hate crimes since October 7th and SNL thinks it’s hilarious…. This is vile. Vile.’

Several others posted to X calling for the show to apologize. 

Saturday Night Live continues to feel the backlash for it’s cold open sketch last night in which it mocked GOP Congresswoman Elise Stefanik for her callout of elite college professors over antisemitism

https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ep-OnsDieFQ%3Frel%3D0

Sara Yael Hirschhorn went further and wrote: ‘This is really appalling — NBC do you think antisemitism is acceptable as the punchline of a joke about American society? This needs to be investigated by the FCC.’

‘Well, I haven’t found SNL funny since they fired Norm McDonald… but now the garbage they’re producing is… vile,’ added Sebastien Togneri. 

Libs of Tik Tok commented: ‘Elise Stefanik handled the pro g*noc*de University Presidents beautifully. So of course SNL mocks her. This is so difficult to watch. Isn’t SNL supposed to be funny?’ 

‘Can’t believe SNL decided to mock those demanding tougher action on Jew-hatred on campus rather than hose making excuses for calls for genocide,’ chimed in Jake Wallis Simons.

DailyMail.com has reached out to NBC and Saturday Night Live for comment. 

The pre-written sketch was rolled out just hours after University of Pennsylvania President Amy Magill – whose testimony before the House panel appeared to be especially smug – resigned in disgrace following a woeful performance these past eight weeks.

SNL newcomer Chloe Troast portrayed Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY), the chair of the House Republican caucus and a loyal supporter of former President Trump.

In a moment that was meant to ridicule Stefanik’s hearing performance – which has generally been widely praised – she said: ‘I’m going to start yelling questions at these women like Billy Eichner.’ 

‘Antisemitism – yay or nay?’ she screamed at the three women playing the college presidents. 

‘Yes or no! Is calling for the genocide of Jews against the code of conduct for Harvard?’

The actress playing Harvard University’s Claudine Gay responded: ‘Well, it depends on the context.’

‘What? That can’t be your answer,’ Troast’s Stefanik retorted, echoing the shocking real-world interaction between the pair.

‘UPenn lady, same question, yes or no?’ she asked the actress playing Magill.

‘If you don’t say yes, you’re going to make me look good, which is really, really hard to do,’ she continued. ‘So I will ask you straight up. Do you think genocide is bad?’

iHeart Radio host Mark Simone wrote on X following the sketch: ‘Only a hate-filled, anti-Semitic SNL could do a sketch about the anti-Semitic college presidents testifying in front of Congress and make the questioner Congresswoman Stefanik the target of the sketch.’

‘They (SNL) – oddly – tried to skewer Elise Stefanik (who by all accounts won the day) as shrill. I guess I was under the misapprehension that calling a woman “shrill” was sexist,’ wrote another user.

A third disgusted user wrote: ‘Congratulate SNL, everyone. Since they haven’t been funny for years, they’ve now simply transcended comedy and become one big joke. Not sure what’s more pathetic, this vague attempt at comedy, or mocking those who stand up against Antisemitism at a time like this. Filth.’

As the sketch fell flat both live and to the online crowd, the real Stefanik was sending out a scathing indictment of Magill and the other university presidents following the news of the Penn president’s resignation.

‘One down. Two to go,’ she wrote.

SNL’s creator and longtime executive producer Lorne Michaels is Jewish and was born on a kibbutz in what was then British mandated Palestine, before moving with his parents to Toronto.

Under his continued guidance, the show has moved especially far left during the Trump years, largely using its airtime to lambast the political right and make fun of those who oppose woke policy. 

College presidents (Ego Nwodim, L, Chloe Fineman, R) answer questions from members of congress about antisemitism on their campuses during SNL’s cold open

SNL newcomer Chloe Troast portrayed Congresswoman Elise Stefanik and Molly Kearney (R) played Representative Virginia Foxx

The players attempted to mock last week’s hearing, which saw the presidents of Harvard, MIT, and Penn deliver underwhelming testimony to congress about combating anti-Semitism on their respective campuses

Harvard President Claudine Gay at the congressional hearing on antisemitism on campus

Testimony from MIT president Sally Kornbluth was widely criticized

Amy Magill’s hearing performance was the straw that broke the camel’s back and finally cost her her job at the Ivy League – though she will remain a tenured law professor 

Magill was slammed for her testimony, in which she said that reprimanding students who call for a Jewish genocide was not paramount – but ‘context’ specific.

She was asked a ‘yes or no’ question on whether calls for the genocide of Jews counted as hate speech, and repeatedly said it depended on the context.

On Wednesday she attempted to clarify her comments, but the damage was done: a wealthy alumnus withdrew a $100 million donation, and her remarks were roundly condemned by the ADL, the White House and politicians across the board.

Magill issued a groveling video statement attempting to explain her failure to condemn calls for the genocide of Jewish people on campuses.

She said she was not ‘focused’ on the issue, and said she wanted to ‘be clear’ that calls for genocide were ‘evil, plain and simple’ – although she said the blame lay with her university’s policies and the constitution, rather than with her.

Magill said: ‘There was a moment during yesterday’s Congressional hearing on antisemitism when I was asked if a call for the genocide of Jewish people on our campus would violate our policies.

‘In that moment, I was focused on our university’s long-standing policies – aligned with the U.S. Constitution – which say that speech alone is not punishable.

‘I was not focused on, but I should have been, the irrefutable fact that a call for genocide of Jewish people is a call for some of the most terrible violence human beings can perpetrate. It’s evil, plain and simple.’

The real Elise Stefanik (pictured) celebrated Magill’s resignation Saturday by sharing a message that began: ‘One down. Two to go’

Magill said she hoped to draw a line in the sand, and clarify her position.

‘I want to be clear: a call for genocide of Jewish people is threatening, deeply so,’ she said.

‘It is intentionally meant to terrify a people who have been subjected to pogroms and hatred for centuries, and were the victims of mass genocide in the Holocaust.

‘In my view it would be harassment or intimidation.’

But, Magill said, it was not officially classed as harassment – a policy she said was outdated and needed review.

Magill pledged to work to update the existing rules.

‘For decades under multiple Penn presidents and consistent with most universities, Penn’s policies have been guided by the Constitution and the law,’ she said.

‘In today’s world, where we are seeing signs of hate proliferating across our campus and our world in a way not seen in years, these policies need to be clarified and evaluated.

‘Penn must initiate a serious and careful look at our policies.’

She concluded that she was ‘committed to a safe, secure and supportive environment so all members of our community can thrive. We can, and we will, get it right.’

On Thursday, as the House Education Committee said they were investigating the issue further, the board of Wharton – the world’s first business school, founded in 1881 at the University of Pennsylvania – said Magill needed to resign.

In a letter addressed to her, they said leadership of the university needed to change ‘with immediate effect’.

Source: Read Full Article