- Digital key management company Rivetz has been charged by the SEC with operating an illegal securities offering.
- The defunct company ran an initial coin offering in 2017 that raised $18 million from U.S. investors and the public.
- Rivetz failed to deliver on its promises, while its founder spent the funds raised on personal expenses.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has charged Rivetz with operating an illegal and unregistered securities offering.
Rivetz Failed to Register With SEC
Rivetz was founded in 2015 with the stated goal of creating a digital key management system based on trusted hardware.
According to the SEC, Rivetz sold digital assets called “RvT tokens” to investors in the U.S. and elsewhere through an ICO beginning in 2017. However, Rivetz was not registered with the SEC.
The SEC noted that RvT sales raised $18 million in cryptocurrency from investors in this way and that it had promoted the RvT tokens by promising future value and availability on exchanges.
Rivetz Tokens Had No Utility
The SEC went on to criticize RVT’s lack of utility, stating “buyers could not purchase any goods and services using RvT tokens, and the tokens had no other use in any Rivetz product or service.”
Furthermore, the firm spent or redeemed all of the crypto assets that the sale had raised by March 2018. Some of those funds were used by founder Steven Sprague on personal expenses.
Rivetz is now defunct. The company’s web presence seems to have ended sometime in 2020 when its website went offline. Its Twitter profile was last updated in September 2019.
SEC Decisions Remain Controversial
Defunct crypto companies that failed to meet their promises are often targeted by the SEC. In other similar cases over the past few months, the regulator targeted Coinschedule and Loci.
While the news around Rivetz may be seen as a justified penalty for wrongdoing, it also comes alongside more controversial SEC actions.
Earlier this week, the regulator threatened to sue crypto exchange Coinbase over its lending products. Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong has contested this, calling the SEC’s actions “sketchy behavior.”
Meanwhile, the SEC has also delayed its decision on a VanEck Bitcoin ETF, a repeatedly rejected investment fund proposal that has been under revision since at least 2017.
Finally, the SEC is locked in conflict with Ripple, which is fighting the claims that its XRP sales violated regulations.
Disclaimer: At the time of writing this author held less than $75 of Bitcoin, Ethereum, and altcoins.
The information on or accessed through this website is obtained from independent sources we believe to be accurate and reliable, but Decentral Media, Inc. makes no representation or warranty as to the timeliness, completeness, or accuracy of any information on or accessed through this website. Decentral Media, Inc. is not an investment advisor. We do not give personalized investment advice or other financial advice. The information on this website is subject to change without notice. Some or all of the information on this website may become outdated, or it may be or become incomplete or inaccurate. We may, but are not obligated to, update any outdated, incomplete, or inaccurate information.
You should never make an investment decision on an ICO, IEO, or other investment based on the information on this website, and you should never interpret or otherwise rely on any of the information on this website as investment advice. We strongly recommend that you consult a licensed investment advisor or other qualified financial professional if you are seeking investment advice on an ICO, IEO, or other investment. We do not accept compensation in any form for analyzing or reporting on any ICO, IEO, cryptocurrency, currency, tokenized sales, securities, or commodities.
See full terms and conditions.
Source: Read Full Article